#13 librejs compatibility

Open
opened 8 years ago by bill-auger · 4 comments

this is a FSF "ethical repo" criteria

there is a PR upstream that may accomplish this or at least make progress towards it

upstream issue --> https://pagure.io/pagure/pull-request/1249

this is a FSF "ethical repo" criteria there is a PR upstream that may accomplish this or at least make progress towards it upstream issue --> https://pagure.io/pagure/pull-request/1249
zPlus commented 8 years ago

Anyway, I can add them (later today) and also make the JS compatible with LibreJS.

I'll update the branch tonight.

This sounds like Pagure is soon gonna be compatible with LibreJS already! Honestly I wasn't expecting this, great work!

> Anyway, I can add them (later today) and also make the JS compatible with LibreJS. > > I'll update the branch tonight. This sounds like Pagure is soon gonna be compatible with LibreJS already! Honestly I wasn't expecting this, great work!
bill-auger commented 8 years ago
Owner

regarding a custom UI:

i had a promising result making the demo examples of the WT platform acceptable to libreJS - not sure how well it scales to full sites but so far it was easier than when i did it for rails boilerplate

https://notabug.org/bill-auger/wt/src/librejs

regarding a custom UI: i had a promising result making the demo examples of the WT platform acceptable to libreJS - not sure how well it scales to full sites but so far it was easier than when i did it for rails boilerplate https://notabug.org/bill-auger/wt/src/librejs

Wt is still a contender for the HTML frontend parts. The only downside I see with it is that it lacks some flexibility, but the benefits are huge.

One of the downsides is actually that it includes its own http server, this may be a problem as I need another http server to expose the rest endpoints. Maybe Wt can also implement that, if it can I think it may be the ideal solution.

Wt is still a contender for the HTML frontend parts. The only downside I see with it is that it lacks some flexibility, but the benefits are huge. One of the downsides is actually that it includes its own http server, this may be a problem as I need another http server to expose the rest endpoints. Maybe Wt can also implement that, if it can I think it may be the ideal solution.
bill-auger commented 8 years ago
Owner

i opened an issue on the WT forum asking if they are interested in this feature

http://redmine.emweb.be/boards/1/topics/13315

i opened an issue on the WT forum asking if they are interested in this feature http://redmine.emweb.be/boards/1/topics/13315
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No assignee
3 Participants
Loading...
Cancel
Save
There is no content yet.